Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of antongavazuk@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6d9991030910160518r12e320b6p4b4b593a01d754f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6d9991030910140311vb74e96ct43b298d1645a31a2@mail.gmail.com>
	<e2a35cbc0910141404y751ac805wf4ac69e9f692b1d4@mail.gmail.com>
	<6d9991030910142341u132b8b54xb326adaa20d5f0b3@mail.gmail.com>
	<e2a35cbc0910150228t6351a377yacade757e2964f76@mail.gmail.com>
	<6d9991030910150526u44973fd5u3628c0dc70635fb2@mail.gmail.com>
	<e2a35cbc0910150558k5b44ba9ft49feef25820bdcc3@mail.gmail.com>
	<6d9991030910160518r12e320b6p4b4b593a01d754f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:22:18 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAMs7E18RGfC+mmsF-TO4_q4KAJyH33pXT9MyESsHK4SGYejrvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Session inside Stateless Session EJB
From: Anton Gavazuk <antongavazuk@gmail.com>
To: Jackrabbit users <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04190c50d2b24504d571f54b

--f46d04190c50d2b24504d571f54b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi community,
this discussion has been started long time ago but final aswer has not been
provided,
is anyone find right approach ?


2009/10/16 Jaco Prinsloo <jacolists@gmail.com>

> Stateless beans are exclusively available for one user at a time, but it
> might be used by multiple users in sequence. In other words, members of a
> SLSB don't have to be thread-safe, but they may not be tight to a specific
> user either. So just to confirm, there should be no problem with multiple
> users using the same Session instance, as long as they don't do so
> concurrently?
>
> Thanks,
> Jaco
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Guo Du <mrduguo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Jaco Prinsloo <jacolists@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks, so I assume there isn't any problem with reusing a session (as
> > > subsequent requests to the EJB could be made by different users)?
> >
> > I am not familiar with EJB. The bottom line is that jcr session
> > shouldn't be used by different user at the same time if they are going
> > to perform updates. If Stateless bean is exclusive available for one
> > user, it's safe to reuse the session for different methods. But if
> > multiple user could access the same bean instance, the session
> > shouldn't be reused.
> >
> > -Guo
> >
>

--f46d04190c50d2b24504d571f54b--