From users-return-19417-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Wed Feb 6 23:32:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6505FE840 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 23:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34260 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 23:32:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 34222 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2013 23:32:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 34208 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2013 23:32:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:32:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:32:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.236.139] (helo=joe.nabble.com) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3ETF-0006L0-Ct for users@jackrabbit.apache.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:32:05 -0800 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:32:05 -0800 (PST) From: mmjose26 To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Message-ID: <1360193525209-4657643.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Clustering Question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> If you use a database persistence manager, the configured database connection must not be under the control of an external transaction manager. Jackrabbit implements distributed XA transaction support on a higher level, and expects to be in full control of the underlying database connection. > > How would I know if it is under the control of an external transaction > manager? Would this be configured in websphere? > yes, i don't know how do it in Websphere, but in OC4J container you can configure any data source for local transactions only. And Using jackrabbit JCA you can delegate transactions to container. -- View this message in context: http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/Clustering-Question-tp4657612p4657643.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.