Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CAA19F6C for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 00:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80059 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 00:09:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80019 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 00:09:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 80011 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2012 00:09:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:09:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of prvs=5878430ca=Ross.Dyson@ipaustralia.gov.au designates 165.12.251.80 as permitted sender) Received: from [165.12.251.80] (HELO mail-ext2.deewr.gov.au) (165.12.251.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 00:09:41 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,363,1344175200"; d="txt'?scan'208";a="53964454" Received: from unknown (HELO vmail.aipo.gov.au) ([165.12.202.5]) by Mail-ext2-private.dmz.ige with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Sep 2012 10:09:19 +1000 Received: from cbr1pdom05.production.prod (cbr1pdom05.aipo.gov.au [172.30.32.214]) by vmail.aipo.gov.au (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8409JOM006267 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:09:19 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Deployment question: is Jackrabbit process-safe? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] X-KeepSent: 9F1EA190:BE23821C-CA257A6F:0000B4EC; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Ross.Dyson@ipaustralia.gov.au Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:10:15 +1000 X-X_Protective_Marking: [VER=2005.6, NS=gov.au, SEC=UNCLASSIFIED, ORIGIN=Ross.Dyson@ipaustralia.gov.au] X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NOTESHUB01/SERVERS/IPAustralia(Release 8.5.1|September 28, 2009) at 04/09/2012 10:09:19 AM, Serialize complete at 04/09/2012 10:09:19 AM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1346717359-3206-112" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 10.0.100.191 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------------=_1346717359-3206-112 In-Reply-To: References: To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Deployment question: is Jackrabbit process-safe? [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] X-KeepSent: 9F1EA190:BE23821C-CA257A6F:0000B4EC; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Ross.Dyson@ipaustralia.gov.au Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:10:15 +1000 X-X_Protective_Marking: [VER=2005.6, NS=gov.au, SEC=UNCLASSIFIED, ORIGIN=Ross.Dyson@ipaustralia.gov.au] X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NOTESHUB01/SERVERS/IPAustralia(Release 8.5.1|September 28, 2009) at 04/09/2012 10:09:19 AM, Serialize complete at 04/09/2012 10:09:19 AM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0000DA9DCA257A6F_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0000DA9DCA257A6F_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline the first jackrabbit to start up the repository locks the repository by creating a lock file. Ross From: "Esmond Pitt" To: Date: 04/09/2012 10:04 AM Subject: Deployment question: is Jackrabbit process-safe? I have a clustered web-app that uses Jackrabbit. I presently have Jackrabbit in yet another Tomcat and am using RMI to communicate with it. However it occurs to me that I could just include the JackRabbit API jars in the webapp and call it directly, *provided* multiple copies of the Jackrabbit API will co-operate correctly on the database. Is this the case? EJP --=_alternative 0000DA9DCA257A6F_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline the first jackrabbit to start up the repository locks the repository by creating a lock file.

Ross



From:        "Esmond Pitt" <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com>
To:        <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Date:        04/09/2012 10:04 AM
Subject:        Deployment question: is Jackrabbit process-safe?



I have a clustered web-app that uses Jackrabbit. I presently have Jackrabbit
in yet another Tomcat and am using RMI to communicate with it. However it
occurs to me that I could just include the JackRabbit API jars in the webapp
and call it directly, *provided* multiple copies of the Jackrabbit API will
co-operate correctly on the database. Is this the case?

EJP
--=_alternative 0000DA9DCA257A6F_=-- ------------=_1346717359-3206-112 Content-Type: text/plain; name="disclaimer.txt" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="disclaimer.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) -- This message contains privileged and confidential information only for use by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must not disseminate, copy or use it in any manner. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using. ------------=_1346717359-3206-112--