Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F3A4D43D for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79490 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2012 13:11:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 79402 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jun 2012 13:11:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 79391 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jun 2012 13:11:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:11:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hermes.pjm56@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.170] (HELO mail-yx0-f170.google.com) (209.85.213.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 13:11:08 +0000 Received: by yenl12 with SMTP id l12so7907660yen.1 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=uLXn8wHMWLB6IzRsq2VEgUYNtgyc4GhHDTXiOWS18Jc=; b=VMiPL4sVLlBBhsQP8P9mvWaIUcg7FlwmkuYolQDbYv3ZAUnWKP7wZzaD9iHx7b59B7 7cI2BCh9GvXnqPPSbhI980AUwFrTRZgJ+yNSDK9wuYXPrfPbG9SGpBttsForPGQduKKl /WIHHZ8gtbXgw14xApvAI76hxBFEVeUco+Dqs0gKTQ0X7N/TaQqLHQzWV2xp5tN89S/d n6aizF0O74e8dgTBqFcPawDcE6GO7M8aIbkHGhmKP/7sn4ZJzeXKwnHizuQprr+ZJhWo jrAffegfxEJV24V63IJj7Q2I0yuDc2BYlwcBOENYz1Oiy7RVvLIQ1cSALSkKRAwp1IEw 4HgA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.30.101 with SMTP id r5mr19646927oeh.68.1340111447304; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.6.212 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:10:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:10:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OCM and general NoSQL confusion From: pjm56 To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb20678c6aa7004c2d30273 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb20678c6aa7004c2d30273 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Ard, Thanks for getting back to me. > My gut instinct is that Jackrabbit OCM, with JCR annotations, is a way to > > do this. > > Opinions do divert here a bit I guess : Some think plain JCR should be > enough and rather refrain from OCM. > How would I go about using "plain JCR"? - I've seen some other people talk about this, but I am not sure I really understand what they mean. Can you point me to an example? I am trying to free as much time as I can to work on the OCM branch, > and hope to be able to tag a 2.x version next week > Cool, thanks. So what is the currently state of the art? Is it the 1.4 JAR that I saw in Maven central, or should I be using the source directly and compiling my own classes? All the best, James --e89a8fb20678c6aa7004c2d30273--