Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AC897C264 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55048 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2012 13:19:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 54961 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2012 13:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 81329 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2012 11:19:42 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nicole705@inwind.it designates 212.52.84.101 as permitted sender) X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020C.4FB23BB1.013B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1821 Message-ID: <6278874.879041337080753478.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:19:13 +0200 (CEST) From: "nicole705@inwind.it" Reply-To: "nicole705@inwind.it" To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: JackRabbit information request, please! :-) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SenderIP: 62.221.168.95 X-libjamv: 9/AqAEywb5I= X-libjamsun: nc4PD+v269ibAWltwv9dwwWAC6hO74rd X-Priority: 2 (High) Importance: high Hi Jukka, my name is Nicole and I'm dealing with JackRabbit clustering. Please, could you explain me how clustering works? It's not clear for me understand if all cluster nodes make write operation, or il only the master instance does it. In my application I would like to improve write performance, could it be setting a cluster a good solution, or this approach improves only read operations? Thank you very much, kind regards, Nicole P.S: please note that my running JR instance use Persistance Manager on SQL Server, and a datastore on file system.