Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ajgoel@epsilon.com designates
 64.18.1.181 as permitted sender)
From: "Goel, Ajay" <ajgoel@epsilon.com>
To: "users@jackrabbit.apache.org" <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:36:55 -0400
Subject: RMI for performance critical app
Thread-Topic: RMI for performance critical app
Thread-Index: Ac0ZgtH1nMUTLOmSSciV+mY4b/KLLw==
Message-ID: 
 <F14387C9BBE9C643AD915EC7D9AC7ABD867563938F@PMACPWEXCLS01.corp.epsilon.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_F14387C9BBE9C643AD915EC7D9AC7ABD867563938FPMACPWEXCLS01_"
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_000_F14387C9BBE9C643AD915EC7D9AC7ABD867563938FPMACPWEXCLS01_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The documentation talks about RMI not being optimum for performance critica=
l app. Can someone involved with this project please confirm if this statem=
ent (Note also that RMI remoting layer has not been optimized for performan=
ce) only applies to the standalone deployment http://jackrabbit.apache.org/=
standalone-server.html?


Thanks


________________________________
This e-mail and files transmitted with it are confidential, and are intende=
d solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is add=
ressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent res=
ponsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified t=
hat any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is str=
ictly prohibited. If you are not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise=
 have reason to believe that you received this message in error, please imm=
ediately notify sender by e-mail, and destroy the original message. Thank Y=
ou.

--_000_F14387C9BBE9C643AD915EC7D9AC7ABD867563938FPMACPWEXCLS01_--