jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: FineGrainedISMLocking implementation for concurrent access.
Date Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:54:47 GMT

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Sessa, Romain
<Romain.Sessa@experian.com> wrote:
> I'm a developer on a JAVA project that uses Jackrabbit. We need to have
> a better management of concurrent access on a node. The LockManager API
> isn't enough, among others read access is not forbidden on a locked
> node. We find "FineGrainedISMLocking" interface that seems allow to
> change lock policy for concurrent access. We don't found a simple
> explanation of how to implement it. Have you some development lines for
> us ?

FineGrainedISMLocking is a low-level tool that you most likely
shouldn't be using from the application level.

Can you describe your use case in more detail? Without knowing the
exact requirements it's hard to suggest a solution.


Jukka Zitting

View raw message