Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69BDB61B5 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:15:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58870 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 21:15:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58849 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2011 21:15:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 58841 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2011 21:15:26 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:15:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [188.40.37.16] (HELO hq1.backendmedia.com) (188.40.37.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:15:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C34200C1A2 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 21:15:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at backendmedia.com Received: from hq1.backendmedia.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hq1.backendmedia.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zsBXUgxr5Jql for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:15:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.177] (217-162-131-234.dynamic.hispeed.ch [217.162.131.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mls@pooteeweet.org) by hq1.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A977A200C163 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 23:15:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Kahwe Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: versioning performance Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 23:14:53 +0200 Message-Id: To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, I am looking for some infos in regards to versioning performance. How is performance affected as the number of versions are created in = general? How is the performance affected on a particular node as more versions = are created? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.org