jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Dürig <mic...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lucene 2.9
Date Wed, 25 May 2011 14:27:03 GMT
Jackrabbit recently upgraded to Lucene 3.0. See 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2415

Michael

On 16.8.10 22:32, Ard Schrijvers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Klimetschek<aklimets@day.com>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 16:41, Thomas Kratz<eiswind@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am new to this list and I hope I get some help. I need Jackrabbit to run
>>> against Lucene 2.9 as hibernate search depends on it. Do I have such a
>>> chance when I do a build from head, is it already running against lucene
>>> 2.9.3 ?
>>
>> No, since 2.0 (afaik), Jackrabbit depends on Lucene 2.4.1. Not sure,
>> but I think using a newer Lucene would require quite a few changes in
>> Jackrabbit and further testing.
>
> This is correct. Lucene internal index format has also changed, so the
> indexes itself aren't backwards compatible.
>
> Long story, but some day we, Jackrabbit, will need to catch up with
> lucene to make use of all lately added features and improvements. This
> will take however quite some changes, I'll hope to be able to invest
> this in a couple of months
>
>>
>> However, Jackrabbit and Hibernate don't (shouldn't) need to use the
>> same indexes, so you can run different versions in parallel.
>
> I wouldn't even know how they could :-)
>
> Regards Ard
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alex
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Klimetschek
>> alexander.klimetschek@day.com
>>
>

Mime
View raw message