Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF2CD2E98 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:32:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95251 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 08:32:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 95207 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 08:32:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 95199 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 08:32:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:32:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael.wechner@wyona.com designates 195.226.6.75 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.226.6.75] (HELO mail.wyona.com) (195.226.6.75) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:32:10 +0000 Received: from michael-wechners-macbook-pro-3.local (unknown [195.226.6.66]) by mail.wyona.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6FD182DA42F for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:38:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DBA7773.6070307@wyona.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:31:47 +0200 From: Michael Wechner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: CFP ApacheCon 2011 and Jackrabbit References: <66A37276-8EC2-401D-8DF4-AD61974BCEB8@jahia.com> In-Reply-To: <66A37276-8EC2-401D-8DF4-AD61974BCEB8@jahia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 4/29/11 10:14 AM, Serge Huber wrote: > Hi guys, > > I would like to submit today a paper for the ApacheCon 2011 about our experience on integrating Jackrabbit as a central part of our product. The main idea to talk about the reasons of adopting Jackrabbit as an core part any web solution, the advantages/disadvantages, give some feedback about how things played out in our case from both from a technical and project management point of view, and of course talk a little about the future of Jackrabbit, also in regards to other technologies such as CMIS and the new WCM/WEM OASIS proposal. I would also take the opportunity to share our overall experience of working with Apache projects, as well as talking about how we see our continued involvement, the pitfalls we have experienced, and the lessons we learned. sounds good > The title of this presentation would be "Integrating Jackrabbit : why, how and what's next", and the abstract would be something like this : "Recently, a lot of controversy has arisen about the benefits of technologies such as the JCR. what kind of controversy? Thanks Michael > In this presentation we talk about why and how selecting Jackrabbit as a core technology makes sense, what other alternatives were tried before, how the experience has been, performance, what the future looks like and how it measures compared to alternatives". > > It is my hope that this presentation will help people see all the value in Jackrabbit that it deserves, as I believe it is a project that has achieved a lot in a very short amount of time. > > I welcome any feedback, experience and suggestions you might have, even if negative :) I also would love any references you can give me about Jackrabbit 3, as I must say I am a bit behind on the discussions about the new architecture. > > Best regards, > Serge Huber. >