jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omid <omil...@gmail.com>
Subject why no pattern for item definition names?
Date Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:25:47 GMT

I expected to be able to use patterns for name of node & property
definition in node types. But it doesn't work, and it's mentioned in
specification that other than simple name, only * pattern can be used
that matches all unmatched items with property type. Is there a reason
for not allowing more flexible patterns?

I had a look into source and it seems fairly easy to implement this,
should I go on and do so?

View raw message