jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jzitt...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: why no pattern for item definition names?
Date Fri, 08 Apr 2011 13:32:10 GMT

On 04/08/2011 03:25 PM, Omid wrote:
> I expected to be able to use patterns for name of node&  property
> definition in node types. But it doesn't work, and it's mentioned in
> specification that other than simple name, only * pattern can be used
> that matches all unmatched items with property type. Is there a reason
> for not allowing more flexible patterns?
> I had a look into source and it seems fairly easy to implement this,
> should I go on and do so?

Do you have a good use case where you'd need such a feature? Why can't 
that use case be covered with the existing * pattern?

Jukka Zitting

View raw message