jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alexander Klimetschek <aklim...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Automatically extracted Jackrabbit FAQs
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2011 21:03:52 GMT
Interesting :-)

But from a first glance, I am not sure how to evaluate the answers. Should
I rate? Write a comment? Are comments only for correcting the answer (and
thus not directly useful for your quality statistics)? What if an answer
is wrong or a non-answering email from the mailing list thread was used -
rate it with 1 star?


On 08.03.11 21:54, "Stefan Henß" <stefan.henss@googlemail.com> wrote:

>Hi everybody,
>I'm currently doing research for my bachelor thesis on how to
>automatically extract FAQs from unstructured data.
>For this I've built a system automatically performing the following:
>- Load thousands of conversations from forums and mailing lists (don't
>mind the categories there, don't discriminate between sources).
>- Build new categorization solely based on the conversation's texts (by
>- Pick the best modelled categories as basis for one FAQ each.
>- For each question (first entry in a thread) find the best reply from
>its answers.
>- Select the most relevant and well formatted question/answer-pairs for
>each FAQ.
>For the evaluation I'm interested in expert's perceptions of the
>results, e.g. if the questions are relevant, correctly answered, etc.
>Also as I'll release a paper about the approach I'd be happy if you
>could rate one or two questions (stars on the details pages) so I'd have
>some statistics to present.
>Here's the direct link to the Jackrabbit FAQs:
>(There are some other interesting FAQs as well at http://faqcluster.com/)
>Thanks for your help

Alexander Klimetschek
Developer // Adobe (Day) // Berlin - Basel

View raw message