Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13598 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 15:36:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 15:36:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 50477 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 15:36:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49075 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 15:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 49038 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 15:36:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:36:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.82.250.83] (HELO mail120.messagelabs.com) (216.82.250.83) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:36:17 +0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: mg0855@att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-12.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1296574554!3728048!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.112.25] Received: (qmail 22426 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 15:35:55 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp3.sbc.com (HELO tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com) (144.160.112.25) by server-12.tower-120.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 15:35:55 -0000 Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11FZsAP021797 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:35:54 -0600 Received: from gaalpa1msghub80.ITServices.sbc.com (gaalpa1msghub80.itservices.sbc.com [135.53.26.20]) by tlph064.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p11FZpXx021769 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:35:51 -0600 Received: from GAALPA1MSGUSR90.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.8.36.37]) by gaalpa1msghub80.ITServices.sbc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:35:51 -0500 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBC225.B5003B10" Subject: Jackrabbit dependencies Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:35:50 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: thread-topic: Jackrabbit dependencies thread-index: AcvCJbRqKMVz4G+bR5CHGZPKJXtuuw== From: "GOODWIN, MATTHEW (ATTCORP)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2011 15:35:51.0891 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5259A30:01CBC225] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC225.B5003B10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We'd like to trim down the required dependencies that are deployed in our application. I've seen the output of the mvn dependency:tree but I was curious if some of the poi dependencies can be excluded at runtime. For example, I believe we can exclude the bouncy castle jars since we know we aren't going to be handling encrypted pdfs and the derby jar since we're not using oracle. Any others? =20 Thanks, =20 Matt =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBC225.B5003B10--