jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Norman Maurer <nor...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit dependencies
Date Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:58:47 GMT
Good point Stefan,

thats exactly the cause why we (JAMES) exclude a bunch of
dependencies. I think jackrabbit would better be of to provide a
"light" distribution or mark things like these a optional.

Bye,
Norman


2011/2/2 Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jukka Zitting <jzitting@adobe.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 02/01/2011 04:35 PM, GOODWIN, MATTHEW (ATTCORP) wrote:
>>>
>>> We'd like to trim down the required dependencies that are deployed
>>> in our application.
>>
>> Do you have some pressing need for this (size, licensing, etc.)? If not,
>> by far the easiest solution is just to leave the dependencies intact, as
>> otherwise you'll need to keep reviewing your custom deployment whenever
>> you do an upgrade as the dependency graph may have changed.
>>
>> In the end it's just a few megabytes of extra bits which should nowadays
>
> sorry, but i don't agree. adding 'just a few megabytes' of extra dependencies
> which the majority of the users won't need do add up in the end and
> might cause conflicts in different deployment scenarios.
>
> the recent addition of the netcdf library is IMO an excellent example.
> apparently it did cause classloader issues, it increased the size of
> stand-alone
> jackrabbit by 15% and the majority of jackrabbit users will probably
> never use it... [1]
>
> just my 0.02$
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
> [1] http://jackrabbit.510166.n4.nabble.com/unable-to-build-trunk-missing-dependency-tp3080075p3080160.html
>
>> only be a problem if you're targeting a mobile or other embedded
>> environment. If you do and there's wider demand for something like this, we
>> might want to consider including such a jackrabbit-lite package in our
>> normal releases.
>>
>>> I've seen the output of the mvn dependency:tree but I was curious if
>>> some of the poi dependencies can be excluded at runtime.
>>
>> The POI libraries are used for full text indexing of various Microsoft file
>> formats, most notably MS Office.
>>
>> --
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>

Mime
View raw message