jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jukka Zitting <jzitt...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit dependencies
Date Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:54:32 GMT
Hi,

On 02/03/2011 11:34 AM, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> do you have any convincing use case for keeping rome in jackrabbit
> core?

Not really. It might be useful for something like a feed aggregator
application, but then again such an application would likely store feeds
as fine-grained JCR content instead of Atom/RSS files.

> rome has a dependency on jdom. jdom used to cause class loading
> issues in the past.

Agreed, jdom is troublesome.

> i'd rather prefer to not clutter up jackrabbit core with useless
> dependencies.

What do you think of the idea of moving the tika-parsers dependency from 
jackrabbit-core to the deployment packages like jackrabbit-webapp and 
jackrabbit-jca? Tika is intentionally split into tika-core and 
tika-parsers to allow such a setup.

-- 
Jukka Zitting

Mime
View raw message