Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: NPE in ConcurrentCache
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:42:03 -0500
Message-ID: <A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F2018B5254@crexc42p>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTintmS8pUyyv-=pJLK=jfYZLW4cDbk9AL-bvC50=@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: NPE in ConcurrentCache
Thread-Index: AcvBIbt282oMXhlPTEOJDGhMVDoCjAAImKdg
References: 
 <A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F2018267B0@crexc42p><AANLkTinhPR9OuxZQGCok2Od62DLwu3nij6cOYyEMJ5h3@mail.gmail.com><A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F201826DA3@crexc42p><AANLkTimY6aYRngcS2V7giUc_bTRytzsam_gVf2O14JSG@mail.gmail.com><A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F201827037@crexc42p><AANLkTikNXS0LgDBdt7f5VqUP3OaecNbQ_22hiBJLd2pd@mail.gmail.com><4D429158.3000507@adobe.com><A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F2018B48F4@crexc42p><A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F2018B4B09@crexc42p><AANLkTimUWireTzMg5AUnKsVowY+NiRb+n0iydsQ-oJ0d@mail.gmail.com><A154A89F8632B44599CC8B99F86F50F2018B4C72@crexc42p>
 <AANLkTintmS8pUyyv-=pJLK=jfYZLW4cDbk9AL-bvC50=@mail.gmail.com>
From: "PALMER, THOMAS C (ATTCORP)" <TP3310@att.com>
To: <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>

Stefan -
Don't see an attachment here ... or on JCR-2871.  Did you forget to =
attach?  Thanks -

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Guggisberg [mailto:stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 3:33 AM
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: NPE in ConcurrentCache

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:06 PM, PALMER, THOMAS C (ATTCORP)
<TP3310@att.com> wrote:
> Thanks - but neither suggestion made a difference. =A0Always the same =
NPE at ConcurrentCache.java:47. =A0Other suggestions welcomed ;)

try the attached patch. it's not a fix, it just guards against the NPE.
if it works, at least we know where the problem is.

cheers
stefan

>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Guggisberg [mailto:stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 11:17 AM
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: NPE in ConcurrentCache
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:07 PM, PALMER, THOMAS C (ATTCORP)
> <TP3310@att.com> wrote:
>> Stefan -
>> I see your initial assessment in Jira that this could be specific to =
the
>> JVM. =A0At this point, we're just trying to load some initial nodes =
at
>> repo create time. =A0Is there any change to our configuration that =
would
>> let us temporarily work around this problem? =A0Thanks -
>
> not sure if it helps, but you could try to:
>
> - increase the jvm heap size
> - use Workspace.importXML instead of Session.importXML
>
> cheers
> stefan
>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: PALMER, THOMAS C (ATTCORP)
>> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:56 AM
>> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: NPE in ConcurrentCache
>>
>> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2871. =A0Thanks -
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jukka Zitting [mailto:jzitting@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 4:50 AM
>> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: NPE in ConcurrentCache
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 28.01.2011 10:02, Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:38 PM, PALMER, THOMAS C (ATTCORP)
>>> <TP3310@att.com> wrote:
>>>> I've created a simple project plus test node XML that can dup this.
>>>> Where can I send it? =A0Thanks -
>>>
>>> please send it to my personal email address.
>>
>> Or better yet, file a bug in our issue tracker [1] and attach the =
test
>> case.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR
>>
>> --
>> Jukka Zitting
>>
>