jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Scheidegger <willscheideg...@mac.com>
Subject Re: OCM or JCROM
Date Tue, 02 Nov 2010 07:20:07 GMT
Well, OCM does support annotations AND external, flexible mapping configurations, which is
a good thing... and leaves me wondering what the pros of JCROM are.

-will

On 02.11.2010, at 07:52, Sverker Abrahamsson wrote:

> Well, opposite to you I prefer the annotations but it's good if there is
> flexibility to support both variants.. ;)
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Will Scheidegger [mailto:willscheidegger@mac.com]
>> Sent: den 2 november 2010 7:42
>> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: OCM or JCROM
>> 
>> Thanks for the reply. Good to know that one can get JCR to work with
>> Jackrabbit 2 - although a release instead of patches would be even
>> better ;-)
>> 
>> Concerning JCROM: I'm not a big fan of annotation based solutions. We
>> are using JCR for the Magnolia CMS and extended it to the degree where
>> we can have the mapping configuration in Magnolia's configuration
>> repository itself. This allows the user for instance to add a mapping
>> during runtime without having to recompile and redeploy everything - if
>> the POJO was ready for the additional field of course.
>> 
>> -wil
>> 
>> On 02.11.2010, at 07:33, Sverker Abrahamsson wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> There are patched in jiira for jackrabbit ocm support on jackrabbit
>> 2. I
>>> haven't used it so much yet but it seems to be working.
>>> 
>>> Then there is another question which is best to use, jackrabbit OCM
>> or
>>> JCROM. Maybe joining efforts could be a good idea?
>>> Best regards
>>> Sverker
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Will Scheidegger [mailto:willscheidegger@mac.com]
>>>> Sent: den 1 november 2010 11:08
>>>> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: OCM or JCROM
>>>> 
>>>> Good question! Would be interested in that too.
>>>> Somebody once said something that he/she ported OCM to Jackrabbit 2
>> but
>>>> I think these efforts are lost in the meantime.
>>>> 
>>>> -will
>>>> 
>>>> On 01.11.2010, at 22:17, sam lee wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why is OCM (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/object-content-
>> mapping.html)
>>>> not
>>>>> included in version 2.1.1?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Should I use JCROM (http://code.google.com/p/jcrom)  instead?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>> Sam
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message