jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sverker Abrahamsson" <sver...@abrahamsson.com>
Subject RE: OCM or JCROM
Date Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:52:35 GMT
Well, opposite to you I prefer the annotations but it's good if there is
flexibility to support both variants.. ;)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Will Scheidegger [mailto:willscheidegger@mac.com]
> Sent: den 2 november 2010 7:42
> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: OCM or JCROM
> 
> Thanks for the reply. Good to know that one can get JCR to work with
> Jackrabbit 2 - although a release instead of patches would be even
> better ;-)
> 
> Concerning JCROM: I'm not a big fan of annotation based solutions. We
> are using JCR for the Magnolia CMS and extended it to the degree where
> we can have the mapping configuration in Magnolia's configuration
> repository itself. This allows the user for instance to add a mapping
> during runtime without having to recompile and redeploy everything - if
> the POJO was ready for the additional field of course.
> 
> -wil
> 
> On 02.11.2010, at 07:33, Sverker Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > There are patched in jiira for jackrabbit ocm support on jackrabbit
> 2. I
> > haven't used it so much yet but it seems to be working.
> >
> > Then there is another question which is best to use, jackrabbit OCM
> or
> > JCROM. Maybe joining efforts could be a good idea?
> > Best regards
> > Sverker
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Will Scheidegger [mailto:willscheidegger@mac.com]
> >> Sent: den 1 november 2010 11:08
> >> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: OCM or JCROM
> >>
> >> Good question! Would be interested in that too.
> >> Somebody once said something that he/she ported OCM to Jackrabbit 2
> but
> >> I think these efforts are lost in the meantime.
> >>
> >> -will
> >>
> >> On 01.11.2010, at 22:17, sam lee wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey,
> >>>
> >>> Why is OCM (http://jackrabbit.apache.org/object-content-
> mapping.html)
> >> not
> >>> included in version 2.1.1?
> >>>
> >>> Should I use JCROM (http://code.google.com/p/jcrom)  instead?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>> Sam
> >
> >



Mime
View raw message