Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=fPVvQBfY4puTodJLZnj653obRh/wIstssMkSoYyYgrUuSQJCSzZPCNzFhpXhupWoJG
         CJpWQVwSO7fg720xOxOeo5OtGqJ0x0/wJGWFRT+1QcrirBLLtmYvroicdg/rkQaKlQl7
         UlF3sITP515EakpwFksz8pWAjVcTdQXApaFRE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <632606AC-F259-4DE0-BE15-DEFD12C19F6C@sptci.com>
References: <AANLkTi=g2njvbQFJm0auXU5-wBXDNm4=TorHBwW=ReOF@mail.gmail.com>
	<632606AC-F259-4DE0-BE15-DEFD12C19F6C@sptci.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 13:05:36 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTikS0ksgG-0-5=fZw=BtTHXp8J4MQnf+B2QpFz5S@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: improving efficiency
From: ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Rakesh Vidyadharan <rakesh@sptci.com> wro=
te:
>
> On 28 Oct 2010, at 16:12, ChadDavis wrote:
>
>> I'm working on a CMS based on Jackrabbit. =A0The UI is a RIA, of sorts.
>> The user is presented with a file tree structure. =A0If they are at the
>> root folder, then the tree is pretty big. =A0I *need* to have the whole
>> data model in order to build the file tree in the UI, but it's an
>> obviously costly act. =A0 =A0I'm now trying to determine my options for
>> making this process more efficient. =A0Here's a couple I've thought of,
>> and I'm hoping that someone will provide some guidance.
>>
>> 1) I could load only a portion of the tree, then use Ajax techniques
>> to lazy load the deeper folders in the tree as the user works through
>> them
>
> I use this technique and have not had any issues.
>

How much of the data model do you pull down on the first request?  Do
you wait for the user to click on a folder to get more?

> Rakesh
>