jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Guggisberg <stefan.guggisb...@day.com>
Subject Re: utility of defining properties as protected
Date Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:28:32 GMT
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Palmer, Tom <Tom.Palmer@usi.com> wrote:
> I'm having a hard time understanding the utility of defining a property
> as protected.  If it's protected then the only way to get a value set is
> to also specify autocreated and a default but that doesn't work for
> setting dynamic values since if it's protected I can't reset the value -
> even prior to the first save.
>
> Is protected only useful for built-in types where the implementation has
> total control during node creation?

yes.

cheers
stefan

>
>
>
> Thanks -
>
>
>
> Tom Palmer
>
> Director, Strategic Technology Services
>
> AT&T Hosting & Application Services | 2000 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite
> 140 | Morrisville, NC 27560
>
> Office: +1 (919) 388-5937 | Mobile: +1 (919) 627-5431
>
> thomas.palmer@att.com <mailto:thomas.palmer@att.com>
>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer: This e-mail transmission may
> contain confidential and/or proprietary information of AT&T that is
> intended only for the individual or entity named in the e-mail address.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this
> e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail
> transmission in error, please reply to the sender, so that AT&T can
> arrange for proper delivery, and then please delete the message from
> your inbox. Thank you.
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message