Return-Path: 
 <users-return-16086-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 61047 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2010 19:59:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Sep 2010 19:59:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 15602 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 19:59:33 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15568 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2010 19:59:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15559 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2010 19:59:32 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:59:32 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of monkiki@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.214.42] (HELO mail-bw0-f42.google.com) (209.85.214.42)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:59:27 +0000
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so2320451bwz.1
        for <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>;
 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
         :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=xH52/KTfcWcf/KILVnw6PV9g9K3irXbOTwjz+8lBvZg=;
        b=nqGapydhtShsjWEW7MlXEfsgMzvUQeZtNmm56m+zOGcImc8KgKrLStvRloLv9DXTLq
         ogtSTio9uWUcjz0vvlxLIvFCfDnU618P+TI2br70Em4EdRklcDhImushuzumXPkwZtqe
         lVhHbsta+tC3EIJMutX/H6MhCjzyOBAGH/EQk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=BACnhZzVZnLVhSVJNGfU9JFUrBEcGR2afa/I2EMY7gKaPAsNScKgQUzUYAz4VvlYot
         QidMWJQvOV81UAEatckR3fbE7STCOsqqAI9yyBnE+b8Bpnf+bmQrw+l0b+NfcB94+pIQ
         +bDn7yjpB+ly7rCKFgcghbn+H3jzYHzFHiDbI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.178.67 with SMTP id bl3mr1186351bkb.161.1284062345573;
 Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.119.82 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:59:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik4c2y26YYsx-t6ttapKTkQA1ZZhHjB-UH__ctU@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikkC=K5pi-Y8Bmw5b3cZwj-=mwxE-CB=nm9XCu7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikHzY_GoBFE-jb4qajq5sRtNQE8at+6fC714nEx@mail.gmail.com>
	<SNT107-W601766A7FBDA66700B1AA3C0730@phx.gbl>
	<AANLkTik4c2y26YYsx-t6ttapKTkQA1ZZhHjB-UH__ctU@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 21:59:05 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimgRKKsb-3swpmRbgUCVeiQCEfaiYv8a4i8DN1d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: About jcr:contains for binary content and properties
From: Paco Avila <monkiki@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Thanks Jukka.

After reading the whole email conversation, the main answer to my
initial problem is "you can but is hard to do". I mean, the need of
search only by the extracted (and indexed) document content seems to
be very simple (from my point of view) but is very complex.

I have also been playing with IndexingConfiguration
(http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/IndexingConfiguration) because the
nodeScopeIndex="false" may help me to achieve the desired behavior,
but does not seem to work. At least with Jackrabbit 1.6.1 :(

With this configuration:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE configuration SYSTEM
"http://jackrabbit.apache.org/dtd/indexing-configuration-1.0.dtd">
<configuration xmlns:nt="http://www.jcp.org/jcr/nt/1.0"
               xmlns:okm="http://www.openkm.org/1.0">
  <index-rule nodeType="okm:resource">
    <property nodeScopeIndex="false">okm:author</property>
    <property nodeScopeIndex="false">okm:size</property>
    <property nodeScopeIndex="false">okm:versionComment</property>
  </index-rule>
</configuration>

the okm:author, okm:size and okm:versionComment properties are not
indexed, but but neither is indexed jcr:data.

Note: my okm:resource extends from nt:resource, as you can see in the
node type definition:

[okm:resource] > nt:resource, mix:versionable
- okm:size (long) mandatory
- okm:author (string) mandatory
- okm:text (string)
- okm:versionComment (string) copy

On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2010/9/9 Slavek Tecl <kink80@hotmail.com>:
>> See the post named "Searching for binary values" [...]
>
> ... or just follow the link: http://markmail.org/message/5pr2zqyt4s4t4azb
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>



-- 
OpenKM
http://www.openkm.com
http://www.guia-ubuntu.org