Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 8628 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2010 10:38:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 10:38:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 81193 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 10:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 81026 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2010 10:38:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 81016 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2010 10:38:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:38:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ianboston@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.170] (HELO mail-wy0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:37:55 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so1127350wye.1 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:content-type :mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=j73KUtdiYXndkdsaX9LeZLfyRDFA8v/LWGxA7mio+Lk=; b=L1g2Nn1Og0BMrWf2/QhdCs/5iJ3ok0Ljjbbwf4rXGr1mG+OTVn1dC5bfGHc9EWnw2s /UqntR4KUKf69z6ZtWBZ7c7fDqO9dlYrp+qbMQ3UEkFp7xr0n1jAtBAVLkLPTaH/bC0w uDPma6Rs4cnQr3i6VP6Biq1NNqoRwRcH/7IDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=fQT8srYcjZAatzHsqcrxwAZ2Bkvj3JX1j/vUJJHOb1LxvM3CNa69lcdLxFJg5D3mF3 JK6p38eYV/J2hFrLTcjIjdrwgbkQkd8AvyFlxvIySXjx09W8+w61VboTGI87mxewxo0J zm0MG6Vlbdpllw/Ktf48I/eeBihDi1tD5B8Mo= Received: by 10.216.182.202 with SMTP id o52mr1238530wem.29.1285756653275; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.6] (188-222-179-241.zone13.bethere.co.uk [188.222.179.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r18sm5260605weo.24.2010.09.29.03.37.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ian Boston Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: Lucene consistency in clustered environment From: Ian Boston In-Reply-To: <4CA315F2.8070706@rug.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:37:29 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8FDB12AD-DF8F-441A-8851-9C1D61C4539E@tfd.co.uk> References: <4CA1CD76.9010103@rug.nl> <33BB0FEA-96AD-4EA0-B5EE-4AE0C212B693@tfd.co.uk> <4CA315F2.8070706@rug.nl> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On 29 Sep 2010, at 11:33, Dennis van der Laan wrote: > =46rom your reply I > understand that this should not be the case with Lucene, is it? Every JournalRecord should have been replayed on every machine (at some = time later if the JVM was down). That *should* ensure that all documents = are indexed on all machines.=20 Sounds like this is not happening in your environment. Ian