jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joseph Ottinger <j...@enigmastation.com>
Subject Re: Spring configuration?
Date Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:37:13 GMT
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Müller <thomas.mueller@day.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> > Well, I want to use a FileSystem which is configured via Spring
> What is your use case? Why do you want to use a FileSystem which is
> configured via Spring? Why do you need to use your own FileSystem
> implementation?
> My use case is that I have a distributed datastore (persistent IMDG) and I
don't want the speed problems an RDMS has (plus, I don't want to run a DB at
all.) Plus, it'd be fun.

As far as why configured via Spring: primarily transaction propagation. It's
also to centralize configuration.

I have to say that I'm not sure if I should be using a FileSystem or a
PersistenceManager. I went with FileSystem because that's what the
repository configuration specified first, and that seemed like the first
logical thing to get rid of (and locate in the IMDG.)

> > When is JackRabbit 3 likely to be finalized?
> I'm afraid it will take quite a while until it contains as much
> features as the current Jackrabbit.
> *nod* Well, I look forward to it, then - but I would rather work on
something other than vaporware. If it's not "near completion" then I don't
want to postpone development for it.

> > How will it manage data storage?
> That's not yet completely decided. Most likely it will have less
> storage components. Possibly everything will be stored in one place by
> default. That means no external / separate data store, no Lucene index
> (again, by default), no configuration file, and no FileSystem or
> similar mechanism. Everything stored in one (SQL- or NoSQL-) storage.
> My guess is that the first storage implementation will be JDBC.
If you want NoSQL help, let me know. :)

> > Can I see it now?
> What we have is a prototype I wrote a while ago, but it's far from
> being usable or complete. Unfortunately I didn't have time to work on
> it for quite some time now:
> http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/MicroKernelPrototype
> > Is it documented? (If it is, that's a first for JCR... :)
> In my view, the JCR specification is well written. Jackrabbit
> documentation is here: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/FrontPage -
> if anything is missing please let us know
> I've found the specification to be all right, but the references on USING
the specification tend to be sparse.

In other words, it satisfies the language lawyers, but not the users. (In MY
experience. I'm sure other users have fewer issues.)

Joseph B. Ottinger

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message