Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 62429 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2010 13:21:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Aug 2010 13:21:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 7482 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 13:21:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7163 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2010 13:21:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 7122 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2010 13:21:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:21:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-ww0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:21:15 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so4699503wwb.19 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.147.141 with SMTP id l13mr5524975wbv.229.1282051253343; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:20:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.132.142 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 06:20:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.92.39.5] In-Reply-To: References: <9C50F30A-40CD-4DE9-9E4A-03CE0383CBB0@gmail.com> From: Carl Hall Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:20:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Clustering To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f1e9ca8a79f7048e04d1bf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001485f1e9ca8a79f7048e04d1bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Somewhere along my testing, I decided that databaseType in the Journal bloc= k was superfluous and thought a day of debugging would be nice. :-) All's well that ends well, eh? On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Thomas M=FCller wr= ote: > Hi, > > > And the final change to fix my issue: set databaseType=3D"oracle" in my > > journal definition. > > According to the configuration you posted, the databaseType was > already set to "oracle"? > > > OraclePersistenceManager does this without me setting the parameter > > explicitly (~line 97). Should OracleDatabaseJournal assume the default= s > > that OraclePersistenceManager does? > > Yes. Could you please log a JIRA issue for this problem? I think we > should fix that. > > Regards, > Thomas > --001485f1e9ca8a79f7048e04d1bf--