Return-Path: 
 <users-return-15979-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 20733 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2010 06:24:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2010 06:24:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 65340 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 06:24:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65088 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2010 06:24:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 65079 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2010 06:24:55 -0000
Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:24:55 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [194.8.61.7] (HELO spamslammer1.tirol.gv.at) (194.8.61.7)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:24:33 +0000
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=D6LL_Claus?= <C.KOELL@TIROL.GV.AT>
To: "users@jackrabbit.apache.org" <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:24:06 +0200
Subject: AW: Getting rid of Open-Scoped Locks without LockToken - Timeout?
Thread-Topic: Getting rid of Open-Scoped Locks without LockToken - Timeout?
Thread-Index: ActGDh9HN6Iw9KrVQT+xpGS+hcuwOQB/aVxA
Message-ID: <89934884426A01458CBE55947B042D7219EC965312@EXCHMCA.tirol.local>
References: <4C753FBD.3030905@mail.upb.de>
 <loom.20100827T192928-66@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20100827T192928-66@post.gmane.org>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-cr-puzzleid: {83D3C305-588F-4BD2-84CC-CAE5908AE6ED}
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: BX/Y BhlJ B762 CTDx DTqu Davw EoZ8 Eux4 FCcD FiU0 FjvR
 HGsu HSRB HhvG HxrS
 IoJI;1;dQBzAGUAcgBzAEAAagBhAGMAawByAGEAYgBiAGkAdAAuAGEAcABhAGMAaABlAC4AbwByAGcA;Sosha1_v1;7;{83D3C305-588F-4BD2-84CC-CAE5908AE6ED};YwAuAGsAbwBlAGwAbABAAHQAaQByAG8AbAAuAGcAdgAuAGEAdAA=;Mon,
 30 Aug 2010 06:24:06
 GMT;QQBXADoAIABHAGUAdAB0AGkAbgBnACAAcgBpAGQAIABvAGYAIABPAHAAZQBuAC0AUwBjAG8AcABlAGQAIABMAG8AYwBrAHMAIAB3AGkAdABoAG8AdQB0ACAATABvAGMAawBUAG8AawBlAG4AIAAtACAAVABpAG0AZQBvAHUAdAA/AA==
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi,

see LockManager.lock(NodeImpl node, boolean isDeep, boolean isSessionScoped=
, long timoutHint, String ownerInfo)
where you can give a timoutHint.

greets
claus

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Neil Corbet [mailto:ncorbet@towerhillservices.com]=20
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. August 2010 19:34
An: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Getting rid of Open-Scoped Locks without LockToken - Timeout?

Dominik Klaholt <dokla <at> mail.upb.de> writes:

>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> I just wondered: What can I do if my application breaks in such an=20
> inconvenient way (e.g. hardware failure, or overlooked bug), that an=20
> open-scoped lock stays active? It seems, that locks do not time-out - is=
=20
> there any way to get rid of locks without having the corresponding=20
> LockToken? Or will I never be able to acquire write access again?
>=20
> Thanks
> Dominik
>=20
>=20

Dominik,
  I asked a similar question in the past to no avail. Looking through
the code, I think it gets the nodes itemID and then does some=20
extra-magic on it to create the token. I think you could re-create
this code. I think jackrabbit 2.0 makes it a little easier.=20
But, I am curious what others do about this problem. So, I am=20
giving this question a little bump with a reply. :)

Neil

=20