Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 27766 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2010 08:02:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Jul 2010 08:02:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 26665 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 08:02:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 26253 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2010 08:02:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 26244 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2010 08:02:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:02:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.24.201.138] (HELO mx01.innovations.de) (217.24.201.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:02:17 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1279267256-65de01c80000-L7RJYL X-Barracuda-URL: http://217.24.201.138:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from immpwamx01.innoimm.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx01.innovations.de (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id EAF8C1443DB for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from immpwamx01.innoimm.local ([192.168.18.25]) by mx01.innovations.de with ESMTP id uGSs1vWQ98Rp8C6r for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 192.168.18.25 X-ASG-Whitelist: Client Received: from email.innoimm.local ([192.168.18.4]) by immpwamx01.innoimm.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:57 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: AW: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties Subject: AW: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:00:56 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties Thread-Index: AcskO+vjUHDp78I/R32PPNR86/ZWzwAgIFSw References: From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jul 2010 08:00:57.0065 (UTC) FILETIME=[058BAD90:01CB24BD] X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[192.168.18.25] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1279267256 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam Firewall at innovations.de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Stefan, thanks for your reply. I have made an issue for the described problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2678 Here you will find further informations about the node type definition = and how to reproduce the problem. Could you explain your described workaround there in more detail?=20 I have set the priority to "Blocker" because we can not release our = product with that exceptions. Thanks for your help. Kind regards, Sascha -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com [mailto:stefan.guggisberg@gmail.com] Im = Auftrag von Stefan Guggisberg Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010 18:36 An: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Betreff: Re: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:25 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > I have just tried it with jackrabbit 1.6.1 release and I do not get = these exceptions. > > I tried it both times with a complete fresh installation of the = jackrabbit repository. this is most likely a regression of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2170, which was fixed for 1.6.2. > > Should I make an Issue for that? yes please, and please provide detailed instructions how to reproduce = the issue. > > Is there a workaround for the described problem? I am asking because = it is very critical for us because it seems that you have corrupted your = repository data after the restoring of the backup. your node type definitions could probably be made more strict by e.g. disallowing residual definitions. how is vr:ignore declared? what's the node type definition of the node's node type? cheers stefan > > Regards, > > Sascha > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Sascha.Theves@innovations.de = [mailto:Sascha.Theves@innovations.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010 17:27 > An: users@jackrabbit.apache.org > Betreff: AW: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties > > Hi, > > sorry forgot to mention that I use Jackrabbit 1.6.2 and the exception = trace popus up when I try to get the values of a multi value property = with > > property.getValues(...) > > Stack Trace is: > > java.lang.RuntimeException: property = /vr:repo_area/RuleRepository/vr:project_area/Movie Ticket = Pricing/bin/vr:ignore is a single-valued property, so it's value can not = be retrieved as an array > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at = org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.internalGetValues(PropertyImpl.ja= va:441) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at = org.apache.jackrabbit.core.PropertyImpl.getValues(PropertyImpl.java:475) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0at xxx.MyClass.getProperty(MyClass.java:274) > > Regards > > Sascha > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Sascha.Theves@innovations.de = [mailto:Sascha.Theves@innovations.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. Juli 2010 15:41 > An: users@jackrabbit.apache.org > Betreff: RepositoryCopier and multi-valued properties > > Hi all, > > > > I have problems using the RepositoryCopier with multi-valued = properties. > I create a copy of my repository and read it back again. When I = restore > the copy I get exceptions when I have a multi-valued property with = only > one value. > > > > Any ideas how to fix that? > > > > Regards > > > > Sascha Theves > Platform and Technology (INST/EPI) > > -- > Innovations Software Technology > Bosch Group > Ziegelei 7, 88090 Immenstaad, Germany > Telefon: +49(0)7545-202-537 > Fax: =A0 =A0 =A0 +49(0)7545-202-301 > sascha.theves@innovations.de > > www.innovations.de > > Executives: Achim Berger, Thomas Cotic, Thomas Schmid > Register Court Ulm HRB 631888 > > This message may contain confidential and privileged information. Any > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please inform us immediately and > destroy this message including all copies thereof. > > > >