Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 26955 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2010 14:13:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jul 2010 14:13:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 52938 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2010 14:13:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 52789 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2010 14:13:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 52779 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jul 2010 14:13:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:13:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alfatek@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.170] (HELO mail-wy0-f170.google.com) (74.125.82.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:13:08 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so280373wye.1 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y3CvEPT2nAgOxTQehWWRv59DyYBfc1xLTNoq9BHAWH8=; b=Y1UaAOGhXVUAHt8Ypf8eP1Gmm+DADwua7yk0OleX5+XzAlmupUE6O6yKvhTWrvUFxW h0NzSNDKKPtLZ8C1FEjYmKCkaJn0OVjmOMKdKQIIUc3GgwcXwwTko39CALNSh98kk3FK xMmbvQ5hcTBazJHedb7RV2us3TTM/Au36BqY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ORcZqq34sWrZA08wRxieg1P2FhMZ3ch4EXvVDdH46ZqUhFZG8lMD9TyXCDifSbV22f 3e6zQBoxZi6SFuNkucy3N7HBODtDnlhzDing59xaOqpM6RrGXyqH1O4p/uyjJiqlDNAe BJ8+ItG2p9RdhYulWaMHQYtQfTxGjeouC1KC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.69.17 with SMTP id x17mr3580964wbi.87.1279894367180; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.160.68 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:12:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1279807705.6013.35.camel@localhost> <1279831702.6013.369.camel@localhost> <8D4B6145-8272-4693-8020-C76160788AB4@mac.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:12:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: OCM From: Paulo Silva To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb90c1b19f1048c0ea151 --0016367fb90c1b19f1048c0ea151 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The Jackrabbit website should be updated, that's why this question appears so often... On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Pruitt, Byron S wrote: > Indeed. Thanks for the pointer. I will check archives next time. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Scheidegger [mailto:willscheidegger@mac.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:18 PM > To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org > Subject: Re: OCM > > Funny, this question seems to pop up every other week... > > http://search.gmane.org/?query=ocm+status&group=gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.user > > Cheers, > -will > > On 22.07.2010, at 22:59, Pruitt, Byron S wrote: > > > Does anyone know the status of the OCM framework? I can't find a binary > download and ended up grabbing the svn trunk. The last update to the source > looks to be around June09. > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Steve > > > > --0016367fb90c1b19f1048c0ea151--