Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 44334 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2010 19:14:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Apr 2010 19:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 44437 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44399 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2010 19:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 44390 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2010 19:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:14:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.170] (HELO mail-pv0-f170.google.com) (74.125.83.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 19:14:36 +0000 Received: by pvg6 with SMTP id 6so1498758pvg.1 for ; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hI9EjFKcrlMP4yGZJH9Wc1e5QxF9bMyYZvx9I5FHMtY=; b=b526M6BI1JsIUeUTbfRSx8ZMY5kdmPhJ0UsQIZXyzb3Trmfti7fJubM2KYzViYeXTt t7RJyZkHw2nNui4jKO2iPctYdaLY3YgqWH8o4B+We7rjpelNKybkVv2Zdmj0VK+zsA6f UplZsqApBKtEya5yRwfAp3juUelsh1uLq2Zno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kd230UnANsn6ke57Mxznmv2Yn2B8oq+XMJk+ImFhMbInRveAeaDA4n697DYUsq2vST DZApnFWLLj+an76EvIo7yiwoq0nn9RnbefVRv/B6inLY0+lF+h3/j1VEvDlbCC3aeIJF 4OxzuuGKueXY5QNxGxDL3ghERk8ygHvXAecN4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.157.1 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Apr 2010 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BA102CC.2090807@day.com> References: <4fe4c4f51003111358kbe52730sa2d1548eb616f116@mail.gmail.com> <4BA102CC.2090807@day.com> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 13:14:15 -0600 Received: by 10.142.67.26 with SMTP id p26mr428467wfa.67.1270754055629; Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: versioning implementation From: ChadDavis To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > ChadDavis wrote: >> >> I'm remoting with the davex/spi stack, Jackrabbit 2.0.0. >> >> I'm would like to know what the current state of versioning >> implementation is? =A0Is is mostly done? Partially done? > > jackrabbit 2.1.0 will be the first version were we run > the complete tck-tests and jcr2spi-tests on the setup > jcr2spi - spi2davex - jcrserver. > > the list of known issues for 2.1.0 can be found in > the jackrabbit-spi2dav/pom.xml I see this list in the trunk - 2.2-SNAPSHOT version of jackrabbit-spi2dav/pom.xm. Are the issues listed in that document to be fixed in the 2.1 release, or the 2.2?