From users-return-15119-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Tue Apr 20 22:55:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 6956 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2010 22:55:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2010 22:55:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 78778 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:55:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 78736 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2010 22:55:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 78727 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2010 22:55:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:55:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.198] (HELO mail-yx0-f198.google.com) (209.85.210.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:55:50 +0000 Received: by yxe36 with SMTP id 36so3329928yxe.13 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=IsFp1KIy/15rRVJalFD9tHh0cDXms+B9DqTb/+YQiT8=; b=ZdbHwQx3eGAgfqA3HNhY52pr6eHS0enOHz2mmqCBBU92A6rEdm2+b7YHWStr9ya8wV BchuetKEiagRAYPB8Zi+3xNbqQkB9P5tm1s2h784amPmdxNNdNIzjdaU9BE/yhadWN1M mMStNFxeNaHvisTfDAm6FtRfhk6B/FeQVdudM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Po4+bwu3rqH2EM5SO+OtfPmrqCxnbjO0lDsC8lzbdX1c+gZWRm0kDkiUnJwjCr5gqa 3ko0l5hOZt6BOhDrWK4Co6I4I5A8mrp/pdu0fd5XTjCD5DbAsnjH2RlQYBaLUHJ1c2LO Injx1IGpAX0XNOKn59or8iESoPHXH0ZLxYjuY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.201 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:55:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:55:28 -0600 Received: by 10.101.128.25 with SMTP id f25mr12302438ann.20.1271804128976; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.0 query implementation From: ChadDavis To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Guo Du wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:07 PM, ChadDavis wrote: >> They are translated to jqom or the Abstract Query Model? > Not sure, but they are similar terms: > http://www.day.com/specs/jcr/2.0/6_Query.html The way I read it, the Abstract Query Model is the underlying piece, and the sql and jqom are the "two concrete language bindings". > > -Guo >