Return-Path: 
 <users-return-14720-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 78857 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2010 13:34:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 13:34:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 83793 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 13:34:07 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83754 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2010 13:34:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83745 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2010 13:34:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:34:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aklimets@day.com designates
 207.126.148.85 as permitted sender)
Received: from [207.126.148.85] (HELO psmtp.com) (207.126.148.85)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:58 +0000
Received: from source ([209.85.220.221]) by eu3sys201aob102.postini.com
 ([207.126.154.11]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKS543MNWQCaGPUFRZnZIL+qsOXqc7ex7b@postini.com;
 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:33:38 UTC
Received: by fxm21 with SMTP id 21so68160fxm.11
        for <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>;
 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.4.208 with SMTP id 16mr1043318fas.107.1268660015398; Mon,
	15 Mar 2010 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4B9D288D.9070806@gmail.com>
References: 
 <1774B1C6F7D65448AE964FB69BC08AEE08D7FD46@MKEXCHVS3.Mail.Fiserv.net>
	 <c3ac3bad1003090540m49e919ddw2070c15645aa2e24@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B9D288D.9070806@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:33:35 +0100
Message-ID: <c3ac3bad1003150633k2bb64280n81258c611c372dd5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: What happens if <SearchIndex> tag is missing
From: Alexander Klimetschek <aklimets@day.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 19:18, Sergiy Shyrkov
<my.public.mailing@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will the weak references still work in case SearchIndex element is removed?
> I saw they are using Lucene queries.

You are right, the Node.getWeakReferences() implementation relies on a
search index. If not present, a "no search manager configured for this
workspace" RepositoryException is thrown when calling this method.

Regards,
Alex

-- 
Alexander Klimetschek
alexander.klimetschek@day.com