From users-return-14655-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Tue Mar 09 23:19:06 2010
Return-Path: <users-return-14655-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 39305 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2010 23:19:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2010 23:19:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 94247 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 23:18:37 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94228 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2010 23:18:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@jackrabbit.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.jackrabbit.apache.org>
Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Received: (qmail 94219 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2010 23:18:37 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:18:37 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jim.mccollom@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.173 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.223.173] (HELO mail-iw0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 23:18:36 +0000
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so2730474iwn.13
        for <users@jackrabbit.apache.org>; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:18:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=CX2KkzomD6E5b6wqA3AG0ie5a2oSTO9QqFi8J/R3fAo=;
        b=BlcN5a3Fj8jecHsUi8wDSliFvHrJP6bRIP5GDJ4Fu4cDJk5eIQXoKDL7rFweOgj9pG
         fOH0wY7IpASDIIdbsSIBbW+yk3Uto75S1o90uu8O/5G2eyKrjiTx5LKDET32cmPrxvIl
         cSgmhRhEaRf+7CmZ60d2rKQxxsMBvo7Po0CBo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=AvVLwhAif5auWqguB7IbbYmKD9RfsdNv7xhKanNL2Vrie06LDBbYvfSoCy5+bGPRyk
         XfFrSAooC/b+VD3+LohhtDrJFBd5rbK3h/z0Pi8BIVlBJ1csV0RlLbw70cu5wVSTHIUI
         zaJFtBAppyI9HLhZt+Qjgs/aKYpKcJPtoJFn0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.162.9 with SMTP id t9mr254494ibx.5.1268176695820; Tue, 09 
	Mar 2010 15:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:18:15 -0500
Message-ID: <e5711bb11003091518k3a047a87le2945f6e1f22e95b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Version Tables in Cluster
From: Jim McCollom <jim.mccollom@gmail.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

When setting up a  cluster do the versioning tables need to shared
throughout the cluster or are they local ?