jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dhrubo <dhrubo.ka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit and web application
Date Tue, 30 Mar 2010 03:10:24 GMT
How about embedding the repository in an web app and exposing remoting API -
Rest , SOAP etc for applications who are interested?
I am sure this has been tried. Comments will be highly appreciated.


On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:37 PM, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dhrubo <dhrubo.kayal@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Chad -
> > some examples / source will be appreciated
>
> The jackrabbit site has examples for all of this.  The remoting wiki
> page is the best source for the remoting strategies, and the "same
> JVM" method is well documented also, again there are several options.
> They all make use of a servlet that is found in the jackrabbit-webapp
> module; this servlet inits the repository and makes it available in
> the servlet container.
>
>
>
> >
> > I guess embeded one is fastest but is there any data to prove it?
>
> There's no network layer . . . I'm not sure you need data to prove
> that it would be faster.  But if you need specifics, you'll probably
> have to produce them yourself.  I'd be interested to see the numbers
> you come up with.  I'm going to release my own numbers when we get
> tests that would be meaningful to the community.
>
> >
> > ~ dhrubo
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ilya Skorik <ilya@skorik.me> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello.
> >> >
> >> > I plan to use jackrabbit in a Web application. Prompt, what strategy
> is
> >> > necessary for selecting for the connection organisation to base?
> >> >
> >>
> >> There are many options.  Actually, it seems that a lot of people are
> >> running the repository inside the webapp.  My team insists on a server
> >> style deployment of the repository, and I found that the spi/davex
> >> remoting is the most robust at this time; perhaps it's even considered
> >> the preferred remoting method.
> >>
> >> See:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RemoteAccess
> >>
> >> Note, there's an RMI method on that same page but it's considered to
> >> lack production performance, and, in Jackrabbit 2.0, it's not even
> >> fully implemented.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > Considering specificity of Web applications when the server handles
> set
> >> of
> >> > queries from different users.
> >> >
> >> > Whether there is something like connection pooling for jackrabbit?
> >> > --
> >> > View this message in context:
> >>
> http://n4.nabble.com/Jackrabbit-and-web-application-tp1694146p1694146.html
> >> > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks ... Dhrubo
> > My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095
> >
> > My Blog -
> > http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/
> >
> > LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo
> >
>



-- 
Thanks ... Dhrubo
My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095

My Blog -
http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/

LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message