jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joseph Ottinger <dreamr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A generic question about JackRabbit
Date Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:47:18 GMT
And I'm a moron - research shows that E.F. Codd went by Ted as well. Sorry,
folks. :)

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Joseph Ottinger <dreamreal@gmail.com>wrote:

> It was E.F.Codd, for one thing, and not Ted. :)
>
> But... relational models work very well for *reporting* but not so much for
> other things. They're kinda slow, for example. Hierarchical and set-related
> models (document-based, ODBMS, and CODASYL dbs, respectively) are much, much
> faster for some operations, and slower for others.
>
> Relational models excel in reporting and warehousing. The rest... meh,
> they're kinda slow on updates and set relationships. We're just so used to
> the lack of speed that we think it's the norm.
>
> However, if you're doing a lot of updates or your set modifications are
> common, you'll typically find the other models faster, and - depending on
> your taste - easier.
>
> Certainly transaction processing is easier with nonrelational.
>
> That's not to say that relational databases are *bad* -- they're just very
> good at structured data, used for reporting, which is what they were used
> for most often. Now they're seen as part of the background noise of data
> storage, so everyone converts their problem into something the relational
> database can use - as opposed to finding the solution that fits the problem
> well.
>
> We've decided to let our tools dictate our solutions, instead of picking
> our solutions to fit our problems.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Rami Ojares <rami.ojares@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I only now stumbled onto JackRabbit project.
>> And a basic question about it rose in me spontaneously.
>>
>> Early in the seventies Ted Codd published relational model as an
>> improvement
>> over the hierarchical model that had been used for data storage until
>> then.
>>
>> So why do we still need a hierarchical model for data storage?
>>
>> Features mentioned like full text search, versioning, transactions,
>> observation, and more
>> can be just as well implemented with the relational model.
>>
>> And what does unstructured data mean?
>> It sounds to me like random noise.
>>
>> - rami
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Joseph B. Ottinger
> http://enigmastation.com
>



-- 
Joseph B. Ottinger
http://enigmastation.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message