jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paco Avila <monk...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit and web application
Date Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:29:26 GMT
Yes, I our application we have the repository embeded in the webapp
and there is an high level api exposed by soap. This application is
open source, so you can see the code. See
http://wiki.openkm.com/index.php/Developer_Guide.

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Dhrubo <dhrubo.kayal@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about embedding the repository in an web app and exposing remoting API -
> Rest , SOAP etc for applications who are interested?
> I am sure this has been tried. Comments will be highly appreciated.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:37 PM, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dhrubo <dhrubo.kayal@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Chad -
>> > some examples / source will be appreciated
>>
>> The jackrabbit site has examples for all of this.  The remoting wiki
>> page is the best source for the remoting strategies, and the "same
>> JVM" method is well documented also, again there are several options.
>> They all make use of a servlet that is found in the jackrabbit-webapp
>> module; this servlet inits the repository and makes it available in
>> the servlet container.
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I guess embeded one is fastest but is there any data to prove it?
>>
>> There's no network layer . . . I'm not sure you need data to prove
>> that it would be faster.  But if you need specifics, you'll probably
>> have to produce them yourself.  I'd be interested to see the numbers
>> you come up with.  I'm going to release my own numbers when we get
>> tests that would be meaningful to the community.
>>
>> >
>> > ~ dhrubo
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Ilya Skorik <ilya@skorik.me> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hello.
>> >> >
>> >> > I plan to use jackrabbit in a Web application. Prompt, what strategy
>> is
>> >> > necessary for selecting for the connection organisation to base?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> There are many options.  Actually, it seems that a lot of people are
>> >> running the repository inside the webapp.  My team insists on a server
>> >> style deployment of the repository, and I found that the spi/davex
>> >> remoting is the most robust at this time; perhaps it's even considered
>> >> the preferred remoting method.
>> >>
>> >> See:
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RemoteAccess
>> >>
>> >> Note, there's an RMI method on that same page but it's considered to
>> >> lack production performance, and, in Jackrabbit 2.0, it's not even
>> >> fully implemented.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Considering specificity of Web applications when the server handles
>> set
>> >> of
>> >> > queries from different users.
>> >> >
>> >> > Whether there is something like connection pooling for jackrabbit?
>> >> > --
>> >> > View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://n4.nabble.com/Jackrabbit-and-web-application-tp1694146p1694146.html
>> >> > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks ... Dhrubo
>> > My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095
>> >
>> > My Blog -
>> > http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/
>> >
>> > LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks ... Dhrubo
> My Book - http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430210095
>
> My Blog -
> http://www.jtraining.com/blogs/blogger/dhrubo/
>
> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dhrubo
>



-- 
OpenKM
http://www.openkm.com
http://www.guia-ubuntu.org

Mime
View raw message