Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 34270 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2010 18:16:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2010 18:16:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 70145 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 18:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 70095 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2010 18:16:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 70084 invoked by uid 99); 18 Feb 2010 18:16:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:16:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Xuetao.Niu@fiserv.com designates 12.145.177.237 as permitted sender) Received: from [12.145.177.237] (HELO Mail1.Fiserv.com) (12.145.177.237) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:16:24 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,498,1262584800"; d="scan'208,217";a="77148956" Received: from unknown (HELO Mail4.Fiserv.com) ([10.3.242.4]) by MKEIronGWOut2.mailgate.fiserv.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Feb 2010 12:16:03 -0600 Received: from mkexchfe2.Mail.Fiserv.net ([10.3.242.27]) by Mail4.Fiserv.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.0.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.0.2) with ESMTP id o1IIG0cA012077 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:16:03 GMT Received: from MKEXCHVS3.Mail.Fiserv.net ([10.3.243.39]) by mkexchfe2.Mail.Fiserv.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:16:00 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAB0C6.6C9CFEC8" Subject: DDLs for databases Jackrabbit2.0 supports? Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:15:53 -0600 Message-ID: <1774B1C6F7D65448AE964FB69BC08AEE08801EE3@MKEXCHVS3.Mail.Fiserv.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: DDLs for databases Jackrabbit2.0 supports? Thread-Index: AcqwxmiaQt8vOqgTS1SrmeZHn1t+zA== From: "Niu, Xuetao" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2010 18:16:00.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CB820E0:01CAB0C6] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAB0C6.6C9CFEC8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, =20 I am wondering the DDL of jackrabbit 2.0 for both all databases supported, which it uses to create the database structure with. The DBA has to create the database beforehand manually due to permission limits. =20 We are storing all (dbFileSystem, dbPersistenceManager, dbBlabla...) in database, so we need the maximal set. =20 Many thanks! =20 Xuetao ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAB0C6.6C9CFEC8--