jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luiz Fernando Teston <feu.tes...@caravelatech.com>
Subject Re: performance
Date Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:26:13 GMT
Alex,


I gonna take a look on these links. Thanks for the fast feedback!


Teston

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Alexander Klimetschek <aklimets@day.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 15:10, Luiz Fernando Teston
> <feu.teston@caravelatech.com> wrote:
> > * To achieve optimal performance may I use some
> DatabasePersitenceManager,
> > FileSystemPersistenceManager or there's another one wich is good for
> optimal
> > performance? Of course I can't use in memory in this case.
> > * I didn't find any example of repository.xml configured to get optimal
> > performance. Do you guys can send me any link or example file?
>
> Did you look at http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ?
>
> > * I didn't find either some page helping to configure lucene indexes to
> make
> > the search faster. Can you send me any link for this also?
>
> You can't improve that much by configuration. It depends on your
> content model and queries. The fastest query type is when looking for
> specific property values (eg. @property='value') or node types via
> element(*, my:nodetype) (which resolves to the same property lookup in
> Lucene internally), or using fulltext lookups (jcr:contains). Path
> steps are not optimized.
>
> See also
> http://n4.nabble.com/Explanation-and-solutions-of-some-Jackrabbit-queries-regarding-performance-td516614.html#a516614
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> --
> Alexander Klimetschek
> alexander.klimetschek@day.com
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message