Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12226 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2010 22:39:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2010 22:39:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 11986 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 22:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 11960 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2010 22:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 11949 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2010 22:39:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:39:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.214 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.214] (HELO mail-bw0-f214.google.com) (209.85.218.214) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:39:20 +0000 Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so4192536bwz.11 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:39:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OveF18b5K/FOWHOSKH/HOoqKndKtFhJs8PjMwXE9q8o=; b=ll3z+IYgu/1HG+VZ88Ki1Ujfwgi0h7kdWeHM9YvGs3SK9tLJu6dRRcyk0WA+YjxOXV 4rtaZDASEN27l30ySO4VzR5xcasslN4VC/xyaLutGXUKAJkC3mtAdk97dHHS4CNbrqwI 1h8jKaPDeMZdl9+yAxPpOzCRm3tO0TAUGTNTk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=B3wBrm8H1MRGvCptIR5/9pJ4hFQu/fpbB+LRoM0c3ShDTc3n73tM4Y4XD3b1Vdd/sg kVCeCwgS8liA5VukZVLjWH+UAto6B+vgv0zYYvwZn5kQkrrrDa7VXzL6MbYBMwTgaLQR RYmdAA16mdTe2Y2Gx3OCrh6OvDdgNn2qpSbqI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.212 with SMTP id m20mr1008051bkd.79.1264545539978; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:38:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4fe4c4f51001261034u1eb7c651uab70c2a7eb1477af@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:38:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4fe4c4f51001261438h2f0ac1f0w50e8e49462359a3b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: data first, structure on demand From: ChadDavis To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > > Jcr node type is kind of database schema, once defined, it's expensive > to update/upgrade. > I don't care about expensive -- I'm only considering an very rare event; not something triggered by users, or regular application level actions. Does this make sense?