jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rakesh Vidyadharan <rak...@sptci.com>
Subject Re: Practical limitations on the number of workspaces
Date Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:31 GMT

On 17 Dec 2009, at 10:46, Guo Du wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Alan Chaney <alan@writingshow.com> wrote:
>> (which is a 3D modelling system) requires a very large number of
>>  references. However, David's Rule #5 - "References considered harmful"
> How large? If it's 1000+ per node and big amount of nodes, jcr may not
> the best solution. But if you like some of the jcr, may consider
> hybrid solution with some other technical such as key/value store :)

If you are using JR 2, then you can use weak references instead of hard references which I
think will mitigate some of the concerns associated with Rule #5.  Have a look at EyeDB/MongoDB/HBase
or similar for some very powerful data stores if JR is not the ideal solution for you.  In
general unless you are dealing with content (automatically index documents etc), JCR is unlikely
to be the best solution.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message