jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com>
Subject Re: Filesystem versus PersistenceManager questions
Date Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:30:26 GMT
Hi,

>> 2) It appears as if there is no good file system backed PM . . . is
> Not sure day.com's TAR PM is based on file system or not. It's best so
> far from what I read from the list.

Yes, the Tar PM (Tar File Persistence Manager) is file based. It is
very fast, faster than the database persistence managers. Also, it is
transactionally safe (unlike BundleFsPersistenceManager) and supports
clustering.

>> 3) Is the Derby PM considered production worthy?  Any reason not to use it?

Another potential problem is performance.

Regards,
Thomas

Mime
View raw message