jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From ChadDavis <chadmichaelda...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Filesystem versus PersistenceManager questions
Date Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:29:32 GMT
BTW, I'm using 2.0-beta3.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:28 PM, ChadDavis <chadmichaeldavis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm reading the PersistenceManager FAQ [1].  There's a part where it
> discusses "What combination of FS and PM is the best choice?"  In
> reading through this section I have a couple of questions:
>
> 1) I read elsewhere that the FS is only used for some administrative
> stuff, like the search index and configuration.  Is this correct?  In
> other words, the FS isn't a part of the storage for the actual repo
> content, that's all done by the PM?
>
> 2) It appears as if there is no good file system backed PM . . . is
> this accurate?  The bundleFsPM is described as non-production, read
> only.  So, this kind of means that the FS is NOT a choice for backing
> the content of my repo, correct?
>
> 3) Is the Derby PM considered production worthy?  Any reason not to use it?
>
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/PersistenceManagerFAQ
>

Mime
View raw message