Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13941 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2009 15:21:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Nov 2009 15:21:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 79979 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 15:21:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 79952 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2009 15:21:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 79941 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2009 15:21:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:21:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of julienpoffet@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.221.186] (HELO mail-qy0-f186.google.com) (209.85.221.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:21:21 +0000 Received: by qyk16 with SMTP id 16so3482727qyk.15 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:21:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=kmEwjcZsHmkJ16rhUSwxGYKa1uBf7klDaQaHlPwcCp0=; b=qWWZ6qkSzy2hHO3TNzRQx+EwtwYYjWjLuUv7F9rYaPDrwc7fjShzo9Rez73c8+IEwJ xw1wcd7y8d09t/pDMs5Pf/xaKY7xiAwDNmr6cmtmMhpSJ0A7RpAtPEdjwSGzx/j5a/SI cEeOtKEVeXD+l0M680vTrki9Mj9sVyMFd2Ep8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Riz/9MXL/Z1KHIMn4hYOS3AANUjFu+4CU2YxhU7LC/pMmhW0Dl0PPSBoXcSRj/Z7Fw bL+nNyIaBwCmyu5tCE9ucHTnRAyHq94Kx4SnbdmCrRjDeEEiwFqNAD0HtVw4YtosvWLE ompJ51hstrKObDQotbVUyAtJSLN4HHMEqPSGQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.14.134 with SMTP id g6mr1148621qca.23.1259162460340; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:21:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:21:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Clustering From: Julien Poffet To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151757667a29c17c0479339b8b --00151757667a29c17c0479339b8b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I was wondering if clustering can work without a shared DB. I mean it is possible to use a File System Persistence Manager, which will use a shared directory between the cluster? In addition the clusters node will of course use a datastore. The point is that read/write to my database decrease considerably the performances. So I was thinking that the a PM which use a shared directory among the cluster might be faster... Am I wrong? Cheers, Julien --00151757667a29c17c0479339b8b--