Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 17944 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 14:40:51 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 14:40:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 76148 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 14:40:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 76128 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 14:40:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 76117 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 14:40:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:40:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mrduguo@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.207] (HELO mail-fx0-f207.google.com) (209.85.220.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:40:41 +0000 Received: by fxm3 with SMTP id 3so3522147fxm.44 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:40:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K3ecaCIaCB0m2iuqqHbpNoSXnLFG22anNwDfJtWm8X8=; b=eLJnTonEGl6G6k2LXriorFWywn6bp6cLcqVEXrpXWi+mVl9SaXWkkRZaajSHbzD9P4 BLmR9ahVLhb3PP+wLEf561tqLpmxVXm5ZlrB6a2jZ327AKjz/iZ8gZPqXzUsKhL024aq 1nsfzr44tDSNNqrH2sqjkJTEtUyiuaPYYFpGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jxnvTh7TnEn1Lr0xJyd2DUzGxSMq4r14Jp2xuqHna1kyUfVxma3d2EYCCQMcyM0y4j 4DkL4B7zbZ60bMb3B0MACU3kpOEeSay+oTW0gT9jClHu5Zc5QchJDn1x2TewvxlERp/p YnmhN+glaqfZ1kO+5GO0Au14McY/yUpbXPQeU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.151 with SMTP id h23mr5128577bkh.194.1254840019496; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:40:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <270909.27316.qm@web65713.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> References: <497120.80423.qm@web65706.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <831727.72948.qm@web65712.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <840186.6311.qm@web65703.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <270909.27316.qm@web65713.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:40:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Fw: node versionning and children From: Guo Du To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org, Nicolas Brasseur Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Nicolas Brasseur wrote: > Ok, thanks for the answer. On last question: > > Does adding mix:versionable mixin force you to always checkin/checkout a node to modify it (and thus create a new version) or is it possible to modify such node without creating a new version ? > NO. But you may try out yourself. -Guo