jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From majohnst <m...@lattaoutdoors.com>
Subject Re: Date Property Performance in 1.6
Date Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:09:24 GMT

I've created an issue in JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-2353




Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 14:50, majohnst <matt@lattaoutdoors.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jackrabbit 1.6 uses Lucene 2.4.1. I think 1.5 uses Lucene 2.4.0. In
>> Jackrabbit 1.6, some things were refactored to work better with 2.4.1.
> 
> jackrabbit 1.5 depends on lucene 2.3.2.
> 
>> The SortedLuceneQueryHits is new in 1.6, so I cannot tell if the
>> performance
>> drop is caused by this new Jackrabbit code or by some code changes in
>> Lucene
>> 2.4.1.
> 
> can you please file a jira issue with your observations and describe
> in more detail how your content structure looks like (number of nodes,
> distinct date values, other property values that you used in your
> query)?
> 
> thanks
> 
> regards
>  marcel
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Date-Property-Performance-in-1.6-tp25704607p25856478.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message