Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 69584 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2009 14:18:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Sep 2009 14:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 57801 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2009 14:17:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 57775 invoked by uid 500); 22 Sep 2009 14:17:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 57764 invoked by uid 99); 22 Sep 2009 14:17:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:17:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jukka.zitting@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:17:50 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so5079112and.1 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CaHQDWLtytTggR2CCO67tcbzG7bAPffM7Ylg30KObz8=; b=CMg5CqRyO0d+3ePFgsfgu/aVhBbzpQ2UKTC7KVjIPUixnncE2jOKpdHC+mAb2s58O7 oeMp6aXGisE40hp4MC5ZTDwoRs/vI26lhrbNOp6XETgzhcpR25ZZ30k+eCfFOjrce3Tm crxdk3jaOXB0A9RtfTmB98j86YkqMvRT1EOK4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ADE2usIgYHz9zuHhCvAIcrQ8hMrYlwAwzh1aH/rBCD9c57/r2pNyqas8XrwvqwaUVO l5XulCk+Yn1mBEKi9uicQyWhjNi6tsACzx2jhuzSsVA9Z7CYJN2MawMirBBZ7/nrYeer fgumuYdie44/0yi3UqPmMJ2osl0XI0XASAUyg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr1048523anb.73.1253629049111; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:17:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4AB8D6DC.6030909@ipros.nl> References: <4AB8D6DC.6030909@ipros.nl> From: Jukka Zitting Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:17:09 +0200 Message-ID: <510143ac0909220717g3571ecebx9e6a5e7c7febb812@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Some insight in the FileSystemFactory To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Patrick Plaatje wrote: > As i=B4m trying to work myself to the basics of the Jackrabbit sources, i= came > across the FileSystemFactory interface. It=B4s not that i find it surpris= ing > that suchs a factory exists, but i cannot find a specific implementation = of > this interface. Ofcourse the RepositoryConfig object implements this > Interface, but invokes the getFileSystem() method on a FileSystemFactory > supplied by the RepositoryConfig constructor? The factory interface is implemented by an anonymous class inside the RepositoryConfigurationParser class. See JCR-1438 [1] for more background on this. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-1438 BR, Jukka Zitting