On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Kenneth Yue<Kenneth.Yue@sun.com> wrote:
> Any ideas? I'm beginning to think this may be a bug.
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.RepositoryImpl.java expects a
> javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory implementation, but I looked over the entire
> Jackrabbit workspace and found only the following classes implement
> javax.naming.spi.ObjectFactory:
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.core.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory
> org.apache.jackrabbit.jcr2spi.RepositoryImpl$Factory
> org.apache.jackrabbit.rmi.client.ClientRepositoryFactory
>
> BindableRepositoryFactory and ClientRepositoryFactory are unrelated to
> WebDAV. RepositoryImpl$Factory is, well, the code that's doing the
> checking, So is the code looking for itself??? How does the code expect
> users to use it? Does the code expect users to write their own
> ObjectFactory implementation and plug it in? Then how exactly is
> org.apache.jackrabbit.client.RepositoryFactoryImpl useful?
>
> What do you all think? Thanks.
Maybe this thread helps: http://markmail.org/message/4oy65gmvjttg42ht
Regards,
Alex
--
Alexander Klimetschek
alexander.klimetschek@day.com
|