jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From markao <tiantian.gao...@nikoyo.com.cn>
Subject Re: Jackrabbit-ocm & jackrabbit-core 1.6 or 2.0
Date Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:13:49 GMT

Thank u very much.


Jukka Zitting wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:13 AM, markao <tiantian.gao.wh@nikoyo.com.cn>
> wrote:
>> I see that the OCM component was moved outside Jackrabbit trunk along
>> with
>> other components that depend only on the standard JCR API. The lastest
>> jackrabbit-ocm version is 1.5.3. It depends on jackrabbit-core-1.5.0(I
>> fount
>> that in the pom.xml of jackrabbit-ocm-1.5.3).
>>
>> <dependency>
>>      <groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit</groupId>
>>      <artifactId>jackrabbit-core</artifactId>
>>      <version>1.5.0</version>
>>      <scope>test</scope>
>> </dependency>
> 
> It's a test dependency. In normal use OCM depends only on the JCR API
> so you can use it with any version of Jackrabbit. It even works with
> other JCR implementations.
> 
>> So I want to know whether it can work with jackrabbit-core-1.6.0. Also if
>> jackrabbit upgrade to 2.0, the ocm component will still work fine?
> 
> Yes. JCR 2.0 is backwards compatible, so JCR 1.0 clients like OCM 1.x
> should work without any changes.
> 
> BR,
> 
> Jukka Zitting
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Jackrabbit-ocm---jackrabbit-core-1.6-or-2.0-tp25378452p25379904.html
Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message