From users-return-12250-apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive=jackrabbit.apache.org@jackrabbit.apache.org Wed Aug 12 14:31:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 14767 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2009 14:31:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Aug 2009 14:31:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 93925 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2009 14:31:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 93903 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2009 14:31:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 93890 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2009 14:31:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:31:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.85.66] (HELO web83702.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (69.147.85.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:31:06 +0000 Received: (qmail 50956 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Aug 2009 14:30:45 -0000 Message-ID: <262602.44128.qm@web83702.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: xqjigZIVM1mm9XzIIZtKvO_nKyY7RPUSZBsYtNjdaKJqcC7HBLPMlxGrxqxdlSWabJLIXBbVbDO_yX45g1ZTc6tLZkVYC8tgUIQHW_V0NrbM5fNJnMAjama5Hr74fjVRvGWh8NuWyZ5A46iZ7hT8EuBwR9QAdtjGPbM9yecikRFJOpZkQPPH0rVAB1HGteIA0piprRmO0zbfnasfa0jUXtfgNuPu91FX.JFT7KaTP44CG8GpVcgKbujdUErcYm_4Z8TPp75kChaGpFndjGi_NUjybsXL2ZrdcA-- Received: from [64.126.23.52] by web83702.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:30:45 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:30:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Pete Subject: Re: will jackrabbit scale to petabyte repository? To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org In-Reply-To: <91f3b2650908112318q2e6bccbkcbba30b3d717343a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-9714941-1250087445=:44128" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0-9714941-1250087445=:44128 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0A=0A>How many nodes do you plan for?=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0A100=E2=80=99s= of millions of nodes but I am=0Aaware of the 10K child node =E2=80=98perfo= rmance limit=E2=80=99 so we will limit child nodes=0Asome how. As long as w= e adhere to the 10k child node limit do you think using a=0Asingle workspac= e will work or would it be better to use several workspaces? =0A =0A>If it's mainly binary data (such as files) I suggest to use the data =0A>store. http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DataStore -=0Athen it shouldn'= t =0A>be a problem. =0A =0A>If there is little binary data, the problem might be backup (it =0A>depends on the persistence manager you use). =0A =0A=0A=0AIt will be mostly binary data=0Aprobably 95% of the storage will b= e the binary files. As far as backup / export=0Agoes do you think the xml e= xport could be done? Can you export only specific=0Aparts of the repository= with jackrabbit or is it all or nothing?=0A=0A =0AThanks.=0A=0A=C2=A0=0A=0A --0-9714941-1250087445=:44128--