jackrabbit-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Juan Pereyra <juan.pere...@globant.com>
Subject Re: About Jackrabbit clustering
Date Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:02:38 GMT
It's much clearer now, at least to me.

Thanks Alex!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Klimetschek" <aklimets@day.com>
To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 3, 2009 1:50:27 PM GMT -03:00 Argentina
Subject: Re: About Jackrabbit clustering

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Juan Pereyra<juan.pereyra@globant.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> So, one should also store binaries in the database? This would almost force us to use
a high end database such as Oracle, wouldn't it?

Using the datastore for binaries works with clustering, since the
items are stored by a unqiue md5 hash of their content. Thus all
clusters can point to the same datastore, eg. a FileDataStore on a

See http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/DataStore

I also updated http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Clustering to include
the DataStore.


Alexander Klimetschek

View raw message