Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 83143 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2009 09:58:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jun 2009 09:58:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27376 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 09:58:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jackrabbit-users-archive@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 27361 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jun 2009 09:58:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@jackrabbit.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@jackrabbit.apache.org Received: (qmail 27350 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jun 2009 09:58:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:58:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ianboston@googlemail.com designates 209.85.219.212 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.212] (HELO mail-ew0-f212.google.com) (209.85.219.212) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:58:07 +0000 Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1098718ewy.43 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:57:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=XiZlNyPlfoS7FMBH0eJkMwT2Uf2dAM2HNSwBhULLuTw=; b=MX+wItBGE9h1IhqE7YsATKEoGJMni6Vtw5UW2OPRLWxxTd7OshRVIuaSLBFxXcaSqT CcrLO948ET5re9P8+UScfy94PTDi5sofunWi9uwwP/Bduw2L2S5M7MDSw2JKQtDxj0Ac TCDvMap00U2Jwh3lB4BAmsdsQYDd+ox0QfOjI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=f9EQ8y2lPrF7dBrI77w7iIaGOzWYWcoAWLAscmcDoj1//gmEqdNDLXBwaDI6MT1BOD OCxAWTtR5sqUaEAMfS/1bU1ixRnHHQT0R4yWRWW0+kIRJWhNaxFuh9dom5Cu51zqvFde fTJAXDp/9llKTe/Q3t8jlpDUFeljDjd4C8R1A= Received: by 10.210.92.5 with SMTP id p5mr4239011ebb.22.1245319066843; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.0.93? (ginger.caret.cam.ac.uk [131.111.21.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm50340eye.46.2009.06.18.02.57.45 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ian Boston Message-Id: <5F0489DB-C755-4EB6-BFB7-F801F4F7C0E7@tfd.co.uk> From: Ian Boston To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org In-Reply-To: <697f8380906180037w441f2338tb5a59c7889c16b98@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: Query that sorts a large result set. Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:57:45 +0100 References: <9B333D29-9580-414C-B451-8CAB9EBA6ED1@tfd.co.uk> <697f8380906170204t5e90030bp215fbadaeee1386d@mail.gmail.com> <9BC2FD1A-9A05-4717-9F5B-E85A5B827027@tfd.co.uk> <697f8380906171433o22d8e8fbi3992b3fcac26f2ad@mail.gmail.com> <8014BEDB-9C42-405F-8AC4-4EFE67CE147C@tfd.co.uk> <697f8380906180037w441f2338tb5a59c7889c16b98@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 18 Jun 2009, at 08:37, Ard Schrijvers wrote: > > If you happen to find the holy grail solution, I suppose you'll let > us know > :-) Also if you would have some memory usage numbers with and > without the > suggestion of mine regarding reducing the precision of you Date > field, this > would be very valuable. > > Regards Ard Would it be possible to use a Scorer and Similarity that operated on the value of the fields to generate a sub optimal sort order ? Ian